The nurse practitioner observes an increase in chlamydia diagnoses and suspects delayed partner notification. What type of hypothesis applies?

The situation described involves the nurse practitioner noticing a pattern or trend—in this case, an increase in chlamydia diagnoses—which leads her to suspect that there may be a specific underlying reason, such as delayed partner notification. This process of moving from specific observations (the increase in diagnoses) to forming a general conclusion or theory about the potential cause (delayed partner notification) illustrates the essence of what an inductive hypothesis represents.

An inductive hypothesis is formulated based on observations that lead to a broader generalization or theory. It relies on patterns observed in data and suggests potential connections or reasons for those observations. The nurse practitioner's observation serves as the foundation for the formulation of the hypothesis about partner notification, which is a characteristic of inductive reasoning.

Other types of hypotheses, such as deductive hypotheses, are based on existing theories and involve testing specific predictions derived from those theories, which does not fit this scenario. Non-directional hypotheses do not specify the direction of the relationship expected and are generally used when researchers do not have a clear expectation about how variables relate, which is not the case here. Meanwhile, a complex hypothesis involves multiple variables and relationships, which is also not the primary focus in this scenario.

Therefore, identifying this nurse practitioner's reasoning as induct