The family nurse practitioner participates in a quality improvement project. Reviewing charts to ensure protocol compliance is an example of?

The activity of reviewing charts to ensure compliance with established protocols is an essential component of quality improvement processes in health care settings. This task is indicative of peer review, where professionals assess each other's work to ensure that standards of care and adherence to protocols are being met.

Peer review supports ongoing evaluation and improvement of practice, enhancing the quality of care provided to patients. It allows for collaborative feedback among colleagues, ensuring that all practitioners are aligned with organizational standards and helping identify areas where improvements are needed. This evaluation mechanism plays a crucial role in maintaining clinical efficacy and safety for patients.

In contrast, core competency refers to the essential skills and knowledge that practitioners must possess. Force field analysis is a tool used to map out the factors that influence a change scenario, allowing for a clearer understanding of what drives or hinders change. Risk analysis focuses on identifying and mitigating potential risks within health care settings, emphasizing safety and compliance but not directly involving the review of peer work for compliance with protocols. These concepts are relevant but do not specifically address the direct evaluation of practitioner performance that occurs in peer review.